← All problems
π(x) versus li(x): The First Sign Change (Skewes' Number)
historic
Posed by John Edensor Littlewood (resolution) / Stanley Skewes (bounds) · 1914 · analytic number theory · resolved 1914 · ~1 min read
· difficulty 4/5
The problem
Let π(x) count primes ≤ x and li(x) the logarithmic integral. Littlewood (1914): π(x) − li(x) changes sign infinitely often. Open effective problem: pin down the first x₀ where π(x₀) > li(x₀) — currently known only to lie somewhere below \(e^727\).95 and above \(10^19\).
History & significance
Numerical evidence through the 19th century suggested li always leads. Littlewood's 1914 proof — that the difference oscillates — is a landmark of analytic number theory, but wildly INEFFECTIVE. Skewes (1933, assuming RH; 1955 unconditionally) produced the first monstrous explicit bounds, launching a century-long race of improvements (Sherman Lehman, te Riele, Bays–Hudson, Stoll–Demichel plotting actual regions near \(10^31\)6).
Connected problems
More in analytic number theory
References
The resolution (human proof)
Existence settled by Littlewood, 1914 — the sign changes infinitely often, and around x ≈ \(10^316\) the difference dips measurably negative in carefully plotted neighbourhoods (Bayes–Hudson–Zeindler computations). What remains open is embarrassingly practical: the exact first crossover. This entry earns its shelf as the canonical case where 'proven' and 'located' diverge by three hundred orders of magnitude.
Read the source →
Verified by curator — see the
API for full claim provenance.