MathsClub Problems, proofs & good company

The Problems

Not schoolwork — the questions that resisted Erdős, Hilbert, and everyone since. The club keeps three shelves: what is still open, what AI recently settled, and what took humanity centuries.

Is every abelian group A with Ext(A, ℤ) = 0 free? Shelah's answer: YES and NO — provably independent of the standard axioms. Set-theoretic pluralism's second monument after CH.

Posed by John Henry Constantine Whitehead · 1952 · set theory / abelian group theory · resolved 1974 · difficulty 4/5

Every elliptic curve over the rationals arises from a modular form. The full theorem — completing the bridge that felled Fermat's Last Theorem — was finished by Breuil, Conrad, Diamond and Taylor six years after Wiles' semistable case.

Posed by Yutaka Taniyama / Goro Shimura (with Weil's reformulation) · 1955 · arithmetic geometry · resolved 2001 · difficulty 5/5

Does the prime-counting function ever outrun the logarithmic integral? Gauss's tables said never. Littlewood proved the lead changes hands infinitely often — and nobody knows where the FIRST flip happens beyond astronomical bounds.

Posed by John Edensor Littlewood (resolution) / Stanley Skewes (bounds) · 1914 · analytic number theory · resolved 1914 · difficulty 4/5

Find all n with n! + 1 a perfect square. Three solutions known since the 1870s-90s — (4,5), (5,11), (7,71) — and absolutely nothing since, despite searches far beyond \(10^9\).

Posed by Henri Brocard · 1876 · number theory · difficulty 3/5

Can \(1^k\) + \(2^k\) + ⋯ + (k−1)^k ever equal \(k^k\)? Only the trivial k=1 solution is known — and any other would need k beyond 10^(10^6).

Posed by Paul Erdős / Leo Moser · 1956 · number theory · difficulty 3/5

Serve requests arriving online with k mobile servers at minimum movement cost. Can any deterministic algorithm achieve k-competitiveness against the optimal offline server placement on EVERY metric space?

Posed by Mark Manasse / Lyle McGeoch / Daniel Sleator · 1990 · online algorithms · difficulty 4/5

online-algorithms

Is there a point set of bounded density that intersects every convex body of volume 1? Sixty years of constructions either hit everything too sparsely or grow exponentially.

Posed by Konrad Danzer · 1965 · combinatorial geometry / discrete geometry · difficulty 4/5

Multiply an irrational number by all powers of 2 and 3 simultaneously: must the fractional parts be dense between 0 and 1? Two commuting actions that should jointly mix — and stubbornly refuse to prove it.

Posed by Hillel Furstenberg · 1967 · ergodic theory / topological dynamics · difficulty 4/5

Euler proved ζ(2) = π²/6 in 1735. Whether ζ(3) is rational stayed open for 243 years — until Roger Apéry announced a miraculous recurrence-driven proof at 64 years old.

Posed by question lineage via Euler's Basel problem · 1735 · number theory · resolved 1978 · difficulty 3/5

Should a set admit a Fourier basis exactly when it tiles by translations? Spectacularly false in dimension ≥ 3 — Terence Tao's counterexample — while the low-dimensional wreckage keeps generating theorems.

Posed by Bent Fuglede · 1974 · harmonic analysis / tiling theory · resolved 2003 · difficulty 4/5

Any dense subset of the n-dimensional tic-tac-toe board contains a whole line. Proven by the FIRST-ever Polymath project — dozens of mathematicians thinking in one comment thread.

Posed by proven collaboratively; conjectured lineage via Furstenberg–Katznelson · 2009 · extremal combinatorics · resolved 2012 · difficulty 4/5

An angel jumps k squares per move eating tiles; a devil burns one square forever. Can the angel escape forever? Conway offered $100 — four independent proofs arrived within months in 2006.

Posed by John H. Conway · 1996 · combinatorial game theory · difficulty 3/5

Given a group presentation and a word, decide if the word equals the identity. Dehn asked for algorithms; logic answered that none can exist — for some groups.

Posed by Max Dehn · 1911 · mathematical logic / group theory · difficulty 3/5

decidability

Are finitely generated groups of bounded exponent necessarily finite? No — wildly no — yet their RESTRICTED cousin said yes so profoundly it earned a Fields Medal.

Posed by William Burnside · 1902 · group theory · difficulty 4/5

group-theory

Among all closed surfaces in 3-space, does the Clifford torus minimise bending energy (∫ H²)? Proven by min-max theory fifty years later, in work that revived geometric measure theory.

Posed by Thomas Willmore · 1965 · differential geometry · resolved 2012 · difficulty 4/5

Can pure states extend uniquely to a bigger algebra? A quantum-measurement question from 1959, resolved in 2013 by undergraduates-will-understand polynomial inequalities — with ripple effects across engineering.

Posed by Richard Kadison / Isadore Singer · 1959 · operator algebras / combinatorics · difficulty 4/5

Counting solutions of equations over finite fields should follow deep topology: zeta functions satisfy RH-analogues because varieties behave like classical manifolds. Deligne's 1974 proof reshaped everything.

Posed by André Weil · 1949 · algebraic geometry / number theory · difficulty 5/5

zeta-functions

How often can the SAME integer appear in Pascal's triangle? Singmaster guessed a uniform bound; the number 3003 appears six times and nobody can rule out seven.

Posed by David Singmaster · 1975 · combinatorial number theory · difficulty 2/5

Does a box exist with integer edges, integer face diagonals AND integer space diagonal? Three centuries of searching; not one example, no proof of impossibility.

· Diophantine geometry · difficulty 3/5

A precise promise problem about labelling cycles of pairwise consistency checks that is believed (was believed?) NP-hard — and became the load-bearing assumption for half of optimal-inapproximability theory.

Posed by Subhash Khot · 2002 · theoretical computer science · difficulty 5/5

How many sets of size w force a sunflower (petals meeting pairwise in the same core)? Should be \(c^w\); sixty-four years of effort moved the base from w down to O(log w) — never to a constant.

Posed by Paul Erdős / Richard Rado · 1960 · extremal combinatorics · difficulty 4/5

Label any tree's vertices 1..n so that edge-differences are all distinct. Sixty years of near-misses culminated in November 2025: every large tree gets ALMOST there.

Posed by Anton Kotzig / Gerhard Ringel · 1963 · graph labelling · difficulty 3/5

Smallest convex blanket covering EVERY set of diameter 1? Pál's 1920 regular hexagon has been shrinking for a century — most recently in 2024.

Posed by Henri Lebesgue · 1914 · convex geometry · difficulty 3/5

Find the smallest-area blanket that can cover a unit-length curve no matter how it bends. Sister puzzle to our solved moving sofa — and still wide open.

Posed by Leo Moser · 1966 · combinatorial geometry · difficulty 3/5

γ = lim(1+1/2+...+1/n − log n) ≈ 0.5772…: we cannot even prove it is IRRATIONAL, let alone transcendental. Mathematics' most embarrassing constant.

Posed by implicit in Leonhard Euler's work · 1735 · number theory · difficulty 5/5

Describe ALL abelian extensions of a number field explicitly, the way roots of unity generate them for Q. Kronecker called it his 'dream of youth'; it built class field theory and still dreams on.

Posed by David Hilbert (after Leopold Kronecker) · 1900 · number theory · difficulty 4/5

Algebraic subvarieties should be visible in étale cohomology: which cohomology classes come from actual cycles? The arithmetic mirror of the Hodge conjecture, and nearly as stubborn.

Posed by John Tate · 1965 · arithmetic geometry · difficulty 5/5

algebraic-cycles

Primes are equidistributed in arithmetic progressions on average up to modulus \(q^{1−ε}\) for EVERY ε — twice the reach of the Bombieri–Vinogradov theorem. Half the modern theory of primes leans on this doubling.

Posed by Peter D. T. A. Elliott / Heini Halberstam · 1968 · analytic number theory · difficulty 5/5

prime-distribution

The Liouville function λ(n) should look random: correlations \sum_{n≤x} λ(n+h_1)...λ(n+h_k) should be o(x) for any fixed shifts. Two-point progress exists; three points and beyond resist.

Posed by Sarvadaman Chowla · 1965 · analytic number theory · difficulty 5/5

multiplicative-functions

Bound the number of limit cycles of a polynomial vector field in terms of its degree. Over 120 years on, not even the quadratic case has a complete answer.

Posed by David Hilbert · 1900 · dynamical systems / ODE · difficulty 4/5

Can ONE single shape tile the plane, but only aperiodically? Yes — the 13-sided "hat", found in 2023 by a hobbyist mathematician and his collaborators, ending a sixty-year quest.

· geometry / tiling theory · resolved 2023 · difficulty 4/5

Is the colouring cost of a tensor product of graphs always the cheaper factor\'s? Fifty-three years of belief ended with Yaroslav Shitov\'s three-page demolition.

Posed by Stephen Hedetniemi · 1966 · graph theory · resolved 2019 · difficulty 4/5

Must every bounded set in n-dimensional space split into n+1 pieces of smaller diameter? True in low dimensions — spectacularly false in high ones.

Posed by Karol Borsuk · 1933 · combinatorial geometry · resolved 1993 · difficulty 3/5

The E₈ and Leech lattices are THE tightest packings of balls in their dimensions — proven by Maryna Viazovska\'s magic modular-form functions in a fortnight that stunned mathematics.

· discrete geometry · resolved 2016 · difficulty 5/5

How wildly does the Riemann zeta function grow on the critical line? Lindelöf said barely at all — a consequence of RH that may be provable even without it.

Posed by Ernst Leonard Lindelöf · 1908 · analytic number theory · difficulty 5/5

l-functions

Every root of a polynomial with all roots in the unit disk should lie within distance 1 of SOME critical point. Gauss-Lucas says critical points live in the disk; Sendov asks for the finer choreography.

Posed by Blagovest Sendov · 1958 · complex analysis / polynomial roots · difficulty 3/5

Can a graph drawn so that every edge meets every other edge exactly once have more edges than vertices? Conway bet $1,000 nobody finds one.

Posed by John H. Conway · 1969 · combinatorial geometry / graph drawing · difficulty 2/5

How far apart can consecutive primes be? Cramér's probabilistic model says never much more than (log p)² — a prediction we cannot approach unconditionally.

Posed by Harald Cramér · 1936 · analytic number theory · difficulty 5/5

prime-gaps probabilistic-models

How few distinct distances must n plane points determine? Guth and Katz nearly closed it in 2010 — leaving only a logarithm standing between us and the answer.

Posed by Paul Erdős · 1946 · combinatorial geometry / incidence geometry · difficulty 4/5

The last survivor: after the three-variable case fell to a 216-character counterexample in 2026, the ORIGINAL two-variable Jacobian question remains open.

Posed by Heinz Otto Keller · 1939 · polynomial mappings / algebraic geometry · difficulty 4/5

Can you always rebuild a graph from its deck of vertex-deleted cards? Ulam-style determinism for combinatorial structure — open for over eighty years.

Posed by Paul J. Kelly / Stanisław Ulam · 1941 · graph theory · difficulty 3/5

Does every graph needing k colours contain k pairwise vertex-disjoint connected subgraphs mutually joined by edges? One conjecture that would explain ALL of colouring.

Posed by Hugo Hadwiger · 1943 · graph theory · difficulty 5/5

graph-minors

\(A^x\) + \(B^y\) = \(C^z\) with all exponents greater than 2 forces a common factor among the bases. Fermat's Last Theorem's living descendant, with a million-dollar bounty.

Posed by Andrew Beal · 1993 · number theory · difficulty 4/5

exponential-diophantine

Perfect numbers equal the sum of their proper divisors. Euclid knew even ones come from Mersenne primes; whether an odd perfect number exists has outlived twenty-three centuries.

· number theory · difficulty 4/5

divisor-function

How algebraically independent can exponentials of numbers be? The master key to transcendence — prove it and Lindemann-Weierstrass, four-exponentials and much more fall out at once.

Posed by Stephen Schanuel · 1965 · transcendental number theory · difficulty 5/5

transcendence

Why is there no formula in radicals for fifth-degree equations? Abel proved none exists; Galois explained exactly why — and invented group theory doing it.

· algebra · resolved 1824 · difficulty 3/5

Trisect the angle, double the cube, square the circle — compass and straightedge alone. Two millennia of failure resolved by nineteenth-century algebra: all three are impossible, and the proofs founded modern field theory.

· classical geometry / algebra · resolved 1882 · difficulty 2/5

Give an algorithm deciding whether a polynomial has integer roots. Impossible — and proving impossibility wove Diophantine equations, Fibonacci numbers and computability into one of the 20th century\'s great joint theorems.

Posed by David Hilbert · 1900 · mathematical logic / number theory · resolved 1970 · difficulty 4/5

decidability

Is there a cardinality strictly between the integers and the reals? The first Hilbert problem dissolved into independence: yes in Gödel\'s universe, no in Cohen\'s — and both are legitimate.

Posed by Georg Cantor · 1878 · set theory / foundations · resolved 1963 · difficulty 5/5

independence

More problems →