MathsClub Problems, proofs & good company

The Problems

Not schoolwork — the questions that resisted Erdős, Hilbert, and everyone since. The club keeps three shelves: what is still open, what AI recently settled, and what took humanity centuries.

Difficulty 3/5 — 38 shown. Clear

Are the nth roots of the primes strictly decreasing? Firoozbakht's 1982 guess would control prime gaps far beyond Legendre — verified computationally, proved nowhere.

Posed by Farideh Firoozbakht · 1982 · Prime numbers · difficulty 3/5

prime-numbers prime-gaps

The distributed-computing classic: is 509203 the smallest k for which k·2ⁿ − 1 is never prime? PrimeGrid grinds on; the answer is a finite search away.

Posed by Hans Riesel · 1956 · Prime numbers · difficulty 3/5

prime-numbers distributed-computing

Sixty years no human could prove that Robbins' weak axiom yields Boolean algebra; in 1996 the EQP prover found the fourteen-step proof alone. The first machine-proved landmark theorem.

Posed by Herbert Robbins · 1933 · Logic / universal algebra · resolved 1996 · difficulty 3/5

universal-algebra automated-reasoning

Is 78,557 the smallest Sierpiński number? Five candidates stand between proof and eternity; PrimeGrid is still searching.

Posed by Wacław Sierpiński / John Selfridge · 1967 · number theory / combinatorics · difficulty 3/5

computational-number-theory

Weight edges 1-2-3 so neighbouring vertex-sums differ. Always possible, with no isolated edges the only obstruction? Open since 2004.

Posed by Michał Karoński / Tomasz Łuczak / Andrew Thomason · 2004 · combinatorics · difficulty 3/5

graph-labellings

Is membership in the Mandelbrot set decidable over the reals? Penrose's 1989 question — computable in weaker models, open in Blum–Shub–Smale.

· computability theory · difficulty 3/5

computability

Is there a dense set in the plane with all mutual distances rational? Ulam's 1946 question — the natural candidates are ruled out, the general case open.

· discrete geometry · difficulty 3/5

discrete-geometry

Every connected graph except K2 has an edge-labelling with all vertex-sums distinct. Open since 1990; verified for paths, wheels, complete and dense graphs.

Posed by Nick Hartsfield / Gerhard Ringel · 1990 · graph labelling · difficulty 3/5

graph-labellings

How many pairwise orthogonal Latin squares of order n exist? The number grows with n but the exact asymptotics connect to deep open questions about the Alon–Tarsi constant and the chromatic number of Cartesian products of complete graphs.

Posed by related to the Alon–Tarsi conjecture and graph list-colouring · 1990 · design theory / combinatorics · difficulty 3/5

\(F_0\) = 3, \(F_1\) = 5, \(F_2\) = 17, \(F_3\) = 257, \(F_4\) = 65537 are all prime. Euler showed \(F_5\) is composite in 1732. Are there any more Fermat primes at all? Only five are known after nearly 400 years.

· number theory · difficulty 3/5

How many points in general position force a convex n-gon? Suk proved g(n) = \(2^{n+o(n)}\), matching Erdős's construction up to subexponential factors. Exact values known only for n ≤ 6.

Posed by Paul Erdős / George Szekeres · 1935 · combinatorial geometry · difficulty 3/5

\(a^b\) is transcendental whenever a is algebraic ≠ {0,1} and b is irrational algebraic. Resolves Hilbert's seventh problem: \(2^{√2}\) IS transcendental, closing a question open since Euler.

Posed by David Hilbert (as part of Problem 7) · 1900 · transcendental number theory · resolved 1934 · difficulty 3/5

π(x) ~ x / log(x): the primes thin out according to the logarithmic integral. The single most consequential theorem in number theory, proven independently by Hadamard and de la Vallée Poussin using Riemann's zeta function.

Posed by Carl Friedrich Gauss (conjecture) / Jacques Hadamard & Charles-Jean de la Vallée Poussin (proof) · 1792 · analytic number theory · resolved 1896 · difficulty 3/5

How many points in general position force n in convex position? Erdős named it 'the happy ending' because Szekeres and Klein met working on it — and married. The exact threshold is still unknown for n ≥ 7.

Posed by Paul Erdős / George Szekeres · 1935 · combinatorial geometry · difficulty 3/5

Beyond the lonely runner conjecture's worst-case bound, what is the SET of lonely times? The structure of this set — its measure, its topology — is completely open even for small runner counts.

Posed by Jörg M. Wills · 1967 · dynamical systems / Diophantine approximation · difficulty 3/5

Can every integer n ≥ 2 be partitioned into classes so that no class contains x, y, x+y? Croot proved yes via the circle method — a triumph of additive combinatorics.

Posed by Paul Erdős / Ronald Graham · 1980 · number theory / combinatorics · resolved 2003 · difficulty 3/5

Find all n with n! + 1 a perfect square. Three solutions known since the 1870s-90s — (4,5), (5,11), (7,71) — and absolutely nothing since, despite searches far beyond \(10^9\).

Posed by Henri Brocard · 1876 · number theory · difficulty 3/5

Can \(1^k\) + \(2^k\) + ⋯ + (k−1)^k ever equal \(k^k\)? Only the trivial k=1 solution is known — and any other would need k beyond 10^(10^6).

Posed by Paul Erdős / Leo Moser · 1956 · number theory · difficulty 3/5

Euler proved ζ(2) = π²/6 in 1735. Whether ζ(3) is rational stayed open for 243 years — until Roger Apéry announced a miraculous recurrence-driven proof at 64 years old.

Posed by question lineage via Euler's Basel problem · 1735 · number theory · resolved 1978 · difficulty 3/5

An angel jumps k squares per move eating tiles; a devil burns one square forever. Can the angel escape forever? Conway offered $100 — four independent proofs arrived within months in 2006.

Posed by John H. Conway · 1996 · combinatorial game theory · difficulty 3/5

Given a group presentation and a word, decide if the word equals the identity. Dehn asked for algorithms; logic answered that none can exist — for some groups.

Posed by Max Dehn · 1911 · mathematical logic / group theory · difficulty 3/5

decidability

Does a box exist with integer edges, integer face diagonals AND integer space diagonal? Three centuries of searching; not one example, no proof of impossibility.

· Diophantine geometry · difficulty 3/5

Label any tree's vertices 1..n so that edge-differences are all distinct. Sixty years of near-misses culminated in November 2025: every large tree gets ALMOST there.

Posed by Anton Kotzig / Gerhard Ringel · 1963 · graph labelling · difficulty 3/5

Smallest convex blanket covering EVERY set of diameter 1? Pál's 1920 regular hexagon has been shrinking for a century — most recently in 2024.

Posed by Henri Lebesgue · 1914 · convex geometry · difficulty 3/5

Find the smallest-area blanket that can cover a unit-length curve no matter how it bends. Sister puzzle to our solved moving sofa — and still wide open.

Posed by Leo Moser · 1966 · combinatorial geometry · difficulty 3/5

Must every bounded set in n-dimensional space split into n+1 pieces of smaller diameter? True in low dimensions — spectacularly false in high ones.

Posed by Karol Borsuk · 1933 · combinatorial geometry · resolved 1993 · difficulty 3/5

Every root of a polynomial with all roots in the unit disk should lie within distance 1 of SOME critical point. Gauss-Lucas says critical points live in the disk; Sendov asks for the finer choreography.

Posed by Blagovest Sendov · 1958 · complex analysis / polynomial roots · difficulty 3/5

Can you always rebuild a graph from its deck of vertex-deleted cards? Ulam-style determinism for combinatorial structure — open for over eighty years.

Posed by Paul J. Kelly / Stanisław Ulam · 1941 · graph theory · difficulty 3/5

Why is there no formula in radicals for fifth-degree equations? Abel proved none exists; Galois explained exactly why — and invented group theory doing it.

· algebra · resolved 1824 · difficulty 3/5

S(5) = 160: the integers 1..160 can be 5-coloured with no monochromatic solution to x + y = z, but 1..161 cannot. A century-old Ramsey constant pinned by SAT.

Posed by Issai Schur · 1916 · Ramsey theory / satisfiability · resolved 2017 · difficulty 3/5

Which convex pentagons tile the plane? Exactly fifteen families — the final word delivered by Michaël Rao\'s exhaustive computer-assisted elimination.

Posed by Karl Reinhardt (problem lineage via Hilbert 18) · 1918 · geometry / tiling theory · resolved 2017 · difficulty 3/5

Colour the edges of complete graphs red/blue: how large before a monochromatic K₅ is forced? For K₅ versus K₅ we know only 43 ≤ R(5,5) ≤ 48.

· Ramsey theory · difficulty 3/5

ramsey-numbers

In any non-empty family of sets closed under union, must some element appear in at least half the sets? Perhaps the simplest open statement in extremal set theory.

Posed by Péter Frankl · 1978 · combinatorics · difficulty 3/5

extremal-combinatorics

Can every fraction 4/n be written as a sum of exactly three unit fractions? Egyptian mathematics meets the distribution of prime factors.

Posed by Paul Erdős / Ernst G. Straus · 1948 · number theory · difficulty 3/5

egyptian-fractions

Does every simple closed curve in the plane contain four points forming a square? Over a century old, proven true for vast classes of curves, false for none.

Posed by Otto Toeplitz · 1911 · topology · difficulty 3/5

jordan-curves

n runners start together on a circular track, each with a distinct constant speed. Must every runner, at some moment, be strictly farther than 1/n of the track from all the others?

Posed by Jörg M. Wills / (popularised by Goddyn) · 1968 · dynamical systems / number theory · difficulty 3/5

diophantine-approximation

Four colours suffice for any map. The first major theorem proved by a computer — and the first mathematical controversy about what a proof is.

Posed by Francis Guthrie · 1852 · graph theory · resolved 1976 · difficulty 3/5

graph-theory formalization