MathsClub Problems, proofs & good company

The Problems

Not schoolwork — the questions that resisted Erdős, Hilbert, and everyone since. The club keeps three shelves: what is still open, what AI recently settled, and what took humanity centuries.

Difficulty 4/5 — 50 shown. Clear

Short vectors balance to constant discrepancy with the right signs. Conjectured O(1), proved O(√log n) — the central open balancing statement.

· combinatorics / number theory · difficulty 4/5

discrepancy-theory

Gaps between perfect powers grow without bound. Catalan settled gap 1 (8 and 9); every other fixed gap is open, and abc would imply them all.

Posed by S. S. Pillai · combinatorial number theory · difficulty 4/5

exponential-diophantine

Subcomplexes of aspherical 2-complexes stay aspherical. Open since 1941; LOT complexes from ribbon discs are the test cases.

Posed by J. H. C. Whitehead · 1941 · knot theory / low-dimensional topology · difficulty 4/5

algebraic-topology

Does the countable chain condition characterise ℝ? Independent of ZFC: Suslin lines exist under V = L, consistently none exist (Solovay–Tennenbaum 1971).

Posed by Mikhail Suslin · 1920 · set theory / foundations · difficulty 4/5

independence

All NP-complete problems are the same problem up to polynomial-time recoding. Open since 1977; a positive answer would reveal deep structure in NP.

Posed by Len Berman / Juris Hartmanis · 1977 · computational complexity · difficulty 4/5

complexity-theory

How evenly can s points spread before some triangle gets tiny? Exact growth of the optimal minimal-triangle area is open between log s/s² and n^-7/6.

· geometry · difficulty 4/5

discrete-geometry

How long can an optimal error-correcting code be? The MDS conjecture caps q-ary codes at length q+1 — proved for prime alphabets, open in general.

· coding theory / combinatorics · difficulty 4/5

coding-theory

Which integers are areas of rational right triangles? Tunnell's criterion decides it assuming BSD; unconditionally, no general method is known.

· Diophantine geometry · difficulty 4/5

arithmetic-geometry

Exact van der Waerden numbers: how long an interval forces a monochromatic k-term progression? Only scattered values known; W(2,7) already open.

· Ramsey theory / satisfiability · difficulty 4/5

ramsey-theory

A polynomial sharing a factor with every derivative must be a power of a linear one. Open since 2001; settled for prime-power degrees, open in general.

Posed by Eduardo Casas-Alvero · 2001 · complex analysis / polynomial roots · difficulty 4/5

polynomials

Below √n, no efficient algorithm finds a planted clique in a random graph. The hardness assumption behind sparse PCA, community detection and average-case crypto.

· probability / theoretical computer science · difficulty 4/5

average-case-complexity

Is randomness essential to efficient computation? BPP = P would follow from strong circuit lower bounds; unconditionally, the question is wide open.

· theoretical computer science · difficulty 4/5

complexity-theory

Randomisation achieves polylog(k)-competitiveness for k-server on every metric, independent of the space size. Best known bounds still depend on n; the k-only bound is open.

· online algorithms · difficulty 4/5

online-algorithms

Every strong measure zero set of reals is countable. Independent of ZFC like the continuum hypothesis: consistent (Laver 1976), refuted under CH (Sierpiński 1928).

· set theory · difficulty 4/5

descriptive-set-theory

Can the product of two 2-spheres carry everywhere-positive curvature? Hopf's 1930s question — no example found, no obstruction proved.

Posed by Heinz Hopf · differential geometry · difficulty 4/5

curvature

How evenly can N points spread on a sphere? The botanist's problem behind spherical codes — exact optima known only for scattered N, including the kissing twelve.

Posed by Pieter Tammes · 1930 · discrete geometry · difficulty 4/5

sphere-packings

How many equal spheres can kiss a central one? Solved in dimensions 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 24 only — every other dimension, starting with 5, remains open.

Posed by the Newton–Gregory debate · 1694 · discrete geometry · difficulty 4/5

Each half of the interval between consecutive squares contains a prime. Stronger than Legendre's conjecture, from which it directly implies the one-prime-per-square case.

Posed by Ludvig Oppermann · analytic number theory · difficulty 4/5

prime-gaps

The square roots of consecutive primes always differ by less than one. A prime-gap conjecture strictly stronger than Legendre's, open since 1986.

Posed by Dorin Andrica · 1986 · analytic number theory · difficulty 4/5

prime-gaps

There is always a prime between consecutive perfect squares. The oldest open problem about prime gaps — weaker than Oppermann's, Andrica's and Cramér's conjectures, and implied by each of them.

Posed by Adrien-Marie Legendre · 1798 · analytic number theory · difficulty 4/5

prime-gaps

Hadwiger–Nelson covers ℝ² (between 5 and 7). What about ℝ³, ℝ⁴, and beyond? Even the growth RATE of χ(ℝ^d) as d increases is unknown within exponential factors.

· combinatorial geometry · difficulty 4/5

Lee spheres tile ℤ^n perfectly for n ≤ 2 and diameter-specific cases. Whether perfect Lee codes exist in higher dimensions beyond known families is one of coding theory's oldest open questions.

Posed by attributed to multiple sources following Golomb–Welch's 1970 conjecture · 1970 · coding theory / combinatorics · difficulty 4/5

Does a projective plane of order 10 exist? No (proven by computation). Order 12? No. But whether planes exist for ALL non-prime-power orders satisfying Bruck–Ryser remains open — order 12 is the smallest unresolved case after the n=10 computation.

Posed by implicit in the Bruck–Ryser–Chowla theorem · 1949 · combinatorics / finite geometry · difficulty 4/5

How many self-avoiding walks of length n exist on a lattice? The growth rate (connective constant) is unknown even for the square lattice — Duminil-Copin and Smirnov solved the hexagonal case exactly in 2010, but every other lattice resists.

Posed by question implicit in Orrick's 1947 work on polymer chains; formalised by Hammersley · 1954 · probability theory / statistical mechanics · difficulty 4/5

Exactly nine imaginary quadratic fields have class number one. Gauss listed them in 1801; proving his list complete took 166 years, involved a solution ignored for twenty years, and required computational verification beyond human capability.

Posed by Carl Friedrich Gauss · 1801 · algebraic number theory · resolved 1967 · difficulty 4/5

The primes contain arithmetic progressions of EVERY finite length. Euler noticed prime patterns in 1770; Green and Tao proved arbitrarily long ones exist — combining Szemerédi's theorem with a transference principle.

Posed by question implicit in Euler's observation that primes show structure · 1770 · additive combinatorics / number theory · resolved 2004 · difficulty 4/5

Can every balanced presentation of the trivial group be reduced to the trivial presentation by Nielsen moves plus conjugations? Connected to the smooth 4-dimensional Poincaré conjecture via handlebody calculus.

Posed by James J. Andrews / Martin L. Curtis · 1965 · combinatorial group theory · difficulty 4/5

A complete theory's countable models are either countably infinite in number or exactly continuum-many — never something in between. Model theory's deepest unresolved classification question.

Posed by Robert Lawson Vaught · 1961 · mathematical logic / model theory · difficulty 4/5

Every ribbon knot bounds a singular disc with only self-intersections of one type. Does every SLICE knot (bounding a disc in 4-space) also bound such a ribbon? The first test case for distinguishing smooth from topological 4D knot theory.

Posed by Ralph Fox / John Milnor (formulated from Fox's question) · 1957 · knot theory / low-dimensional topology · difficulty 4/5

Bond percolation on the square lattice has critical probability exactly 1/2. Harris proved no percolation below; Kesten closed the gap twenty-three years later — founding rigorous percolation theory.

Posed by Ted Harris (conjecture); Harry Kesten (proof) · 1957 · probability theory / statistical mechanics · resolved 1980 · difficulty 4/5

Every high-dimensional normed space contains a subspace of dimension → ∞ that is ALMOST Euclidean. The theorem that launched asymptotic geometric analysis.

Posed by question arising in Banach space geometry (Dvoretzky resolved it affirmatively) · 1958 · convex geometry / Banach space theory · resolved 1960 · difficulty 4/5

Are infinitely many supersingular elliptic curves over ℚ? Kaneko–Zagier conjectured a precise count formula; the answer controls deep connections between modular forms and crystallographic groups.

Posed by attributed to multiple sources in the 1970s modular forms community · 1975 · algebraic geometry / number theory · difficulty 4/5

The Generalised Continuum Hypothesis asks whether \(2^{ℵ_α}\) = ℵ_{α+1} at EVERY level of the cardinal hierarchy. GCH implies CH, so it inherits the same independence — but large cardinals may change the story at higher levels.

Posed by Wacław Sierpiński · 1928 · set theory · difficulty 4/5

Make inscribed-square's affine cousin: does every centrally symmetric convex body contain an inscribed affine-regular hexagon? A test case for understanding symmetric structures inside asymmetric containers.

· convex geometry · difficulty 4/5

If a family of convex sets has the property that among any p sets, some q intersect, how few points pierce the entire family? The (3,2) case is the classical (p,q)-theorem; the tight bound is open for most parameters.

Posed by Hugo Hadwiger / Victor Debrunner · 1957 · combinatorial geometry · difficulty 4/5

The Collatz map extended to negative integers produces additional cycles beyond 0 and -1. Classifying ALL cycles of the generalised 3x±1 map is a harder cousin of the original problem.

· arithmetic dynamics · difficulty 4/5

Can integer polynomials have Mahler measure arbitrarily close to 1 without equalling it? Lehmer's degree-10 polynomial holds the world record ≈ 1.17628 — unbeaten since 1933.

Posed by Derrick Henry Lehmer · 1933 · number theory / arithmetic dynamics · difficulty 4/5

Which closed subsets of [0,1] are invariant under both doubling and tripling mod 1? Only the trivial ones should exist — fifty-plus years of partial rigidity and the general case stands.

Posed by Hillel Furstenberg · 1967 · ergodic theory / fractal geometry · difficulty 4/5

|M(n)| < √n for all n, where M is the Mertens function? A conjecture implying RH — disproved in 1985 by computation so indirect that the first counterexample remains beyond reach even now.

Posed by Thomas Joannes Stieltjes (claimed) / Franz Mertens (conjectured form) · 1885 · analytic number theory · resolved 1985 · difficulty 4/5

Are continuous transformation groups automatically differentiable — i.e., is every locally Euclidean topological group a Lie group? Yes: solved in 1952, with a beautiful twist left open in the non-Archimedean world.

Posed by David Hilbert · 1900 · topological groups / Lie theory · resolved 1952 · difficulty 4/5

Is every abelian group A with Ext(A, ℤ) = 0 free? Shelah's answer: YES and NO — provably independent of the standard axioms. Set-theoretic pluralism's second monument after CH.

Posed by John Henry Constantine Whitehead · 1952 · set theory / abelian group theory · resolved 1974 · difficulty 4/5

Does the prime-counting function ever outrun the logarithmic integral? Gauss's tables said never. Littlewood proved the lead changes hands infinitely often — and nobody knows where the FIRST flip happens beyond astronomical bounds.

Posed by John Edensor Littlewood (resolution) / Stanley Skewes (bounds) · 1914 · analytic number theory · resolved 1914 · difficulty 4/5

Serve requests arriving online with k mobile servers at minimum movement cost. Can any deterministic algorithm achieve k-competitiveness against the optimal offline server placement on EVERY metric space?

Posed by Mark Manasse / Lyle McGeoch / Daniel Sleator · 1990 · online algorithms · difficulty 4/5

online-algorithms

Is there a point set of bounded density that intersects every convex body of volume 1? Sixty years of constructions either hit everything too sparsely or grow exponentially.

Posed by Konrad Danzer · 1965 · combinatorial geometry / discrete geometry · difficulty 4/5

More problems →